The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
MNTN · Technology · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | MNTN | AKAM | ACN | EPAM |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 78 (highest) | 78 (highest) | 78 (highest) | 77 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 70 | 95 (highest) | 86 | 64 |
| Pricing power | 97 | 99 (highest) | 56 | 54 |
| Returns on capital | — | 58 | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 100 (highest) | 69 | 73 | 100 (highest) |
| Capital discipline | 44 | 70 | 75 (highest) | 68 |
| Price vs. high estimate | No price data | 110% above high estimate | 34% below high estimate | 44% below high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) |
| Market cap | $144.2M | $17.8B | $91.5B | $4.9B |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |