The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
INTU · Technology · Wide moat
On the watchlist
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | MPWR | INTU | JKHY | URI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 90 (highest) | 90 (highest) | 90 (highest) | 89 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 95 | 100 (highest) | 92 | 100 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 93 (highest) | — | 71 | 70 |
| Returns on capital | 100 (highest) | 97 | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 100 (highest) | 94 | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 60 | 70 | 87 (highest) | 73 |
| 1130% above value if growth stopped today | 134% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 159% above value if growth stopped today | 145% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $59.8B | $88.6B | $11.0B | $66.1B |
| Moat tier | Wide moat | Wide moat | Wide moat | Wide moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2026 | FY2025 |