The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
MSGE · Communications · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
PLNT · Communications · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The businessTrend component abstained: Fewer than two aligned fiscal years of revenue and diluted EPS are available; the filing history does not contain a measurable trend. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
ASTS · Communications · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | MSGE | PRKA | PLNT | ASTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 64 | 67 (highest) | 65 | 63 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 80 (highest) | 58 | — | 60 |
| Pricing power | — | 100 (highest) | 94 | 71 |
| Returns on capital | 77 | 77 | 81 (highest) | — |
| Balance-sheet safety | 40 | 73 | 6 | 78 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 59 | 25 | 80 (highest) | 44 |
| 408% above value if growth stopped today | 282% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | No price data | No price data | |
| Market cap | $3.7B | $30.9M | Not reported | $10.4B |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filing date | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |