The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
CVLG · Industrials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | MTRX | FCUV | CVLG | OESX |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 19 | 20 (highest) | 20 (highest) | 19 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 51 (highest) | 20 | 35 | 25 |
| Pricing power | 0 | 0 | — | 36 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 0 | 0 | 10 | 11 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 28 | 55 (highest) | 13 | 0 |
| Capital allocation | 18 | 24 (highest) | 20 | 24 (highest) |
| No price data | No price data | 35% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | |
| Market cap | $280M | $3.2M | $829M | $94.4M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 |