The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
LZ · Technology · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | MU | LZ | CPAY | QCOM |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 76 (highest) | 76 (highest) | 76 (highest) | 76 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 90 | 74 | 100 (highest) | 49 |
| Pricing power | 40 | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) | 93 |
| Returns on capital | 74 | — | 74 | 97 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 100 (highest) | 71 | 19 | 87 |
| Capital allocation | 77 | 60 | 88 (highest) | 54 |
| 948% above value if growth stopped today | 594% above value if growth stopped today | 111% above value if growth stopped today | 84% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | |
| Market cap | $994.0B | $1.1B | $27.3B | $184.8B |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filing date | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |