The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

NFG · Utilities · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

OTTR · Utilities · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

PEG · Utilities · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

SMC · Utilities · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MeasureNFGOTTRPEGSMC
Moat Score (0–100)5355 (highest)5453
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend7174 (highest)6350
Pricing power96100 (highest)100 (highest)
Returns on capital34 (highest)313
Balance-sheet safety3347 (highest)300
Capital allocation326772 (highest)60
41% above value if growth stopped today23% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today)155% above value if growth stopped today1329% above value if growth stopped today
Market cap$7.5B$3.9B$39.7B$370M
Moat tierShallow moatShallow moatShallow moatShallow moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2025FY2025FY2025