The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

NGTF · Industrials · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

TPICQ · Industrials · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

FGI · Industrials · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

PAMT · Industrials · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MeasureNGTFTPICQFGIPAMT
Moat Score (0–100)17 (highest)17 (highest)17 (highest)16
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend15 (highest)15 (highest)1012
Pricing power0030 (highest)
Returns on capital1720 (highest)7
Balance-sheet safety28 (highest)28 (highest)00
Capital allocation24242444 (highest)
No price dataNo price data62% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today)38% below value if growth stopped today
Market cap$4.5M$341362$8.2M$339M
Moat tierNo moatNo moatNo moatNo moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2025FY2025FY2025