The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
PUMP · Materials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | NPO | GPK | NL | PUMP |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 38 | 39 (highest) | 39 (highest) | 38 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 56 | 74 (highest) | 36 | 70 |
| Pricing power | 57 (highest) | 23 | 52 | — |
| Returns on capital | 0 | 18 (highest) | 4 | 7 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 34 | 5 | 57 (highest) | 53 |
| Capital allocation | 46 | 73 (highest) | 43 | 24 |
| 343% above value if growth stopped today | 44% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 25% below value if growth stopped today | 13344% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $7.1B | $3.3B | $284M | $1.2B |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |