The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

NRDE · Consumer Discretionary · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

GPOX · Consumer Discretionary · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

GRNQ · Consumer Discretionary · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

JOBY · Consumer Discretionary · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MeasureNRDEGPOXGRNQJOBY
Moat Score (0–100)30 (highest)30 (highest)30 (highest)30 (highest)
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend5068 (highest)1340
Pricing power01084 (highest)
Returns on capital0 (highest)0 (highest)0 (highest)0 (highest)
Balance-sheet safety55 (highest)282855 (highest)
Capital allocation44 (highest)44 (highest)2424
No price dataNo price dataNo price dataNo price data
Market capNot reported$3.3M$10.8M$6.3B
Moat tierNo moatNo moatNo moatNo moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2025FY2025FY2025