The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

NRDY · Consumer Discretionary · Narrow moat

Narrow moat

On the watchlist

The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

DDS · Consumer Discretionary · Narrow moat

Narrow moat

Wonderful & reasonably priced

The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

NROM · Consumer Discretionary · Narrow moat

Narrow moat

On the watchlist

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

PATK · Consumer Discretionary · Narrow moat

Narrow moat

On the watchlist

MeasureNRDYDDSNROMPATK
Moat Score (0–100)62 (highest)62 (highest)62 (highest)62 (highest)
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend524378 (highest)23
Pricing power97 (highest)5026
Returns on capital100 (highest)100 (highest)
Balance-sheet safety556740100 (highest)
Capital allocation4489 (highest)3060
No price data100% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today)135% above value if growth stopped today9% above value if growth stopped today
Market cap$1.1B$10.3M$13.3M$2.8B
Moat tierNarrow moatNarrow moatNarrow moatNarrow moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2026FY2025FY2025