The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

NROM · Consumer Discretionary · Narrow moat

Narrow moat

On the watchlist

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

BBY · Consumer Discretionary · Narrow moat

Narrow moat

On the watchlist

DDS · Consumer Discretionary · Narrow moat

Narrow moat

Wonderful & reasonably priced

The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

NRDY · Consumer Discretionary · Narrow moat

Narrow moat

On the watchlist

The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MeasureNROMBBYDDSNRDY
Moat Score (0–100)62 (highest)62 (highest)62 (highest)62 (highest)
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend78 (highest)154352
Pricing power425097 (highest)
Returns on capital100 (highest)100 (highest)
Balance-sheet safety40100 (highest)6755
Capital allocation305489 (highest)44
163% above value if growth stopped today17% above value if growth stopped today100% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today)No price data
Market cap$14.9M$17.9B$8.9M$102M
Moat tierNarrow moatNarrow moatNarrow moatNarrow moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2026FY2026FY2025