The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
NSIT · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
PMNT · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
HCWC · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
| Measure | NSIT | PMNT | F | HCWC |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 42 (highest) | 42 (highest) | 42 (highest) | 42 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 19 | 37 | 57 | 70 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 15 | 60 | 10 | 66 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 58 | — | 72 (highest) | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 29 (highest) | 28 | 28 | 28 |
| Capital allocation | 89 (highest) | 44 | 44 | 44 |
| 17% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | No price data | No price data | |
| Market cap | $3.6B | $3.8M | Not reported | $3.6M |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2025 |