The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
NUVR · Communications · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
SALM · Communications · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
SSP · Communications · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | NUVR | SALM | AKOM | SSP |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 14 | 15 (highest) | 14 | 10 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 35 (highest) | 31 | 20 | 27 |
| Pricing power | — | — | 0 | — |
| Returns on capital | 2 | 4 (highest) | 0 | 3 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 0 | 0 | 28 (highest) | 0 |
| Capital allocation | 17 | 26 (highest) | 24 | 10 |
| 2192% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | No price data | 90% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | |
| Market cap | $83.4M | $27.2M | $807775 | $237M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2022 | FY2025 | FY2025 |