The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
ETN · Industrials · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The balanceSheet component abstained: Insufficient leverage/coverage inputs to score the balance sheet. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | NVT | ETN | OFLX | PH |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 69 | 70 (highest) | 70 (highest) | 69 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 90 | 97 (highest) | 10 | 92 |
| Pricing power | 67 | 53 | 100 (highest) | 34 |
| Returns on capital | 13 | 50 | 100 (highest) | 70 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 78 | — | 100 (highest) | 58 |
| Capital allocation | 97 (highest) | 81 | 38 | 91 |
| 396% above value if growth stopped today | 316% above value if growth stopped today | 29% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 347% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $24.5B | $156.7B | $298M | $125.1B |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |