The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

NWN · Utilities · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

CWT · Utilities · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

PNW · Utilities · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

OPAL · Utilities · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MeasureNWNCWTPNWOPAL
Moat Score (0–100)41 (highest)41 (highest)41 (highest)41 (highest)
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend79626980 (highest)
Pricing power100
Returns on capital132240 (highest)
Balance-sheet safety40 (highest)2910
Capital allocation44 (highest)433344 (highest)
124% above value if growth stopped today169% above value if growth stopped today84% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today)No price data
Market cap$2.1B$3.0B$12.8BNot reported
Moat tierShallow moatShallow moatShallow moatShallow moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2025FY2025FY2025