The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

OCLN · Industrials · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

EML · Industrials · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

FRD · Industrials · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

OZVN · Industrials · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MeasureOCLNEMLFRDOZVN
Moat Score (0–100)3536 (highest)36 (highest)35
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend60 (highest)305020
Pricing power1041 (highest)00
Returns on capital—1922 (highest)—
Balance-sheet safety28392878 (highest)
Capital allocation444979 (highest)44
No price data26% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today)83% above value if growth stopped todayNo price data
Market cap$4.7M$147M$286MNot reported
Moat tierNo moatNo moatNo moatNo moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2025FY2025FY2026