The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
ODFL · Industrials · Wide moat
On the watchlist
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | ODFL | ERII | SNA | LECO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 82 | 83 (highest) | 82 | 81 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 47 | 84 | 78 | 89 (highest) |
| Pricing power | — | 93 (highest) | 78 | 59 |
| Returns on capital | 100 (highest) | 55 | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) | 73 | 64 |
| Capital allocation | 80 | 81 | 83 | 94 (highest) |
| 197% above value if growth stopped today | 29% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 70% above value if growth stopped today | 170% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $39.2B | $351M | $19.1B | $14.4B |
| Moat tier | Wide moat | Wide moat | Wide moat | Wide moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |