The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

OKMN · Materials · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

OLN · Materials · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

AMTX · Materials · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

CLW · Materials · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

MeasureOKMNOLNAMTXCLW
Moat Score (0–100)16 (highest)16 (highest)16 (highest)16 (highest)
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend27202734 (highest)
Pricing power0 (highest)0 (highest)0 (highest)0 (highest)
Returns on capital011 (highest)00
Balance-sheet safety28 (highest)028 (highest)0
Capital allocation2448 (highest)2444
No price data68% below value if growth stopped todayNo price dataNo price data
Market cap$8.3M$2.6B$112MNot reported
Moat tierNo moatNo moatNo moatNo moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2025FY2025FY2025