The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

OLOX · Industrials · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

NGTF · Industrials · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

PAMT · Industrials · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

VSTS · Industrials · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MeasureOLOXNGTFPAMTVSTS
Moat Score (0–100)1517 (highest)1615
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend5151238 (highest)
Pricing power0 (highest)0 (highest)
Returns on capital07 (highest)3
Balance-sheet safety28 (highest)28 (highest)00
Capital allocation44 (highest)2444 (highest)19
No price dataNo price data38% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today)31% above value if growth stopped today
Market cap$3.4M$4.5M$339M$2.1B
Moat tierNo moatNo moatNo moatNo moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2025FY2025FY2025