The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
ONEW · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The businessTrend component abstained: Fewer than two aligned fiscal years of revenue and diluted EPS are available; the filing history does not contain a measurable trend. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
FLY · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | ONEW | MDLK | LEA | FLY |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 41 (highest) | 41 (highest) | 41 (highest) | 41 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | — | 70 (highest) | 69 | 60 |
| Pricing power | 35 | 70 (highest) | 6 | 7 |
| Returns on capital | 58 (highest) | 0 | 39 | — |
| Balance-sheet safety | 28 | 28 | 52 | 55 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 44 (highest) | 40 | 40 | 44 (highest) |
| No price data | No price data | 37% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | |
| Market cap | Not reported | $1.6M | $7.3B | $3.1B |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |