The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

OPAL · Utilities · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

PNW · Utilities · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

NWN · Utilities · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

CEG · Utilities · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MeasureOPALPNWNWNCEG
Moat Score (0–100)41 (highest)41 (highest)41 (highest)41 (highest)
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend80 (highest)697964
Pricing power—100——
Returns on capital40 (highest)216
Balance-sheet safety014052 (highest)
Capital allocation44 (highest)3344 (highest)42
No price data80% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today)112% above value if growth stopped today229% above value if growth stopped today
Market capNot reported$12.5B$2.0B$84.7B
Moat tierShallow moatShallow moatShallow moatShallow moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2025FY2025FY2025