The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
OPY · Other · Narrow moat
Wonderful & reasonably priced
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
AAMI · Other · Narrow moat
Wonderful & reasonably priced
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
UROY · Other · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
SNFCA · Other · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | OPY | AAMI | UROY | SNFCA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 63 | 64 (highest) | 63 | 60 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 59 | 39 | 80 (highest) | 20 |
| Pricing power | — | — | — | 100 |
| Returns on capital | 28 | 100 (highest) | 12 | — |
| Balance-sheet safety | 100 (highest) | 36 | 100 (highest) | 48 |
| Capital allocation | 64 | 80 (highest) | 61 | 72 |
| 46% above value if growth stopped today | 64% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 241% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | |
| Market cap | $1.2B | $3.3B | $519M | Not reported |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 |