The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
ORBT · Technology · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
FTAI · Technology · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | ORBT | GRPN | S | FTAI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 47 (highest) | 47 (highest) | 47 (highest) | 47 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 18 | 20 | 65 | 75 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 61 | 70 | 92 (highest) | 70 |
| Returns on capital | — | 83 (highest) | 0 | — |
| Balance-sheet safety | 55 (highest) | 39 | 55 (highest) | 19 |
| Capital allocation | 53 (highest) | 24 | 24 | 24 |
| No price data | No price data | No price data | 555% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $11.1M | $657M | $7.9B | $15.8B |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2013 | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 |