The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
GTLL · Technology · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | OSIS | SNPS | GTLL | PLTK |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 64 (highest) | 64 (highest) | 64 (highest) | 64 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 92 | 95 (highest) | 63 | 33 |
| Pricing power | 61 | 100 (highest) | 70 | 100 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 40 | 66 | — | 100 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 37 | 0 | 100 (highest) | 28 |
| Capital allocation | 92 (highest) | 60 | 24 | 61 |
| 91% above value if growth stopped today | 401% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | 79% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | |
| Market cap | $3.1B | $71.6B | Not reported | $833M |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filing date | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |