The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
OTIS · Industrials · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
GRBK · Industrials · Narrow moat
Wonderful & reasonably priced
The balanceSheet component abstained: Insufficient leverage/coverage inputs to score the balance sheet. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | OTIS | GRBK | KMT | VMI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 62 | 63 (highest) | 62 | 62 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 65 | 95 (highest) | 73 | 83 |
| Pricing power | — | 33 | 46 (highest) | 40 |
| Returns on capital | 100 (highest) | 24 | 24 | 47 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 34 | — | 78 (highest) | 59 |
| Capital allocation | 49 | 100 (highest) | 91 | 80 |
| No price data | 19% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 34% above value if growth stopped today | 207% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | Not reported | $2.6B | $2.3B | $8.7B |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 |