The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
OXM · Consumer Discretionary · Narrow moat
Wonderful & reasonably priced
ATMU · Consumer Discretionary · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
| Measure | OXM | KRMN | LOW | ATMU |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 67 | 68 (highest) | 68 (highest) | 67 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 53 | 85 (highest) | 39 | 81 |
| Pricing power | 96 (highest) | 64 | 58 | 42 |
| Returns on capital | 68 | 91 | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 55 | 55 | 57 | 58 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 64 | 44 | 84 (highest) | 56 |
| 44% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 2411% above value if growth stopped today | 50% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | |
| Market cap | $580M | $6.3B | $116.5B | Not reported |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filing date | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 |