The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
PARR · Materials · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
AMR · Materials · Shallow moat
On the watchlist
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | PARR | AVNT | MYE | AMR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 48 | 49 (highest) | 48 | 48 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 75 (highest) | 34 | 50 | 17 |
| Pricing power | — | 36 | 52 (highest) | — |
| Returns on capital | 36 | 61 | 45 | 77 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 53 | 100 (highest) | 55 | 55 |
| Capital allocation | 29 | 13 | 39 | 44 (highest) |
| 8% below value if growth stopped today | 36% above value if growth stopped today | 189% above value if growth stopped today | 48% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | |
| Market cap | $3.8B | $3.4B | $1.2B | $1.8B |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |