The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
PLAY · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
On the watchlist
AMBO · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
DKS · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
| Measure | PLAY | ACCS | AMBO | DKS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 58 (highest) | 58 (highest) | 58 (highest) | 58 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 60 | 55 | 82 (highest) | 58 |
| Pricing power | 100 (highest) | 99 | 91 | 49 |
| Returns on capital | 66 | 22 | 0 | 98 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 0 | 55 | 40 | 65 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 64 | 60 | 78 (highest) | 20 |
| 82% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 54% below value if growth stopped today | 1014% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | |
| Market cap | $248M | $18.1M | $103M | Not reported |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 |