The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
GTLL · Technology · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | PLTK | SNPS | GTLL | VICR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 64 (highest) | 64 (highest) | 64 (highest) | 64 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 33 | 95 (highest) | 63 | 71 |
| Pricing power | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) | 70 | 70 |
| Returns on capital | 100 (highest) | 66 | — | 35 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 28 | 0 | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 61 (highest) | 60 | 24 | 44 |
| 65% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 386% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | No price data | |
| Market cap | $1.4B | $69.5B | Not reported | Not reported |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |