The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

PMNT · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

AN · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The capitalDiscipline component abstained: Not enough owner-earnings history to score capital discipline. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

EVI · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

F · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

MeasurePMNTANEVIF
Moat Score (0–100)42 (highest)42 (highest)42 (highest)42 (highest)
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend375060 (highest)57
Pricing power60 (highest)283410
Returns on capital53472 (highest)
Balance-sheet safety2840 (highest)3328
Capital allocation4480 (highest)44
No price dataNo price dataNo price dataNo price data
Market cap$3.8M$7.3BNot reportedNot reported
Moat tierShallow moatShallow moatShallow moatShallow moat
Filing dateFY2026FY2025FY2025FY2025