The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

PMNT · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

DRVN · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

AN · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The capitalDiscipline component abstained: Not enough owner-earnings history to score capital discipline. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

F · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

MeasurePMNTDRVNANF
Moat Score (0–100)4243 (highest)4242
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend3782 (highest)5057
Pricing power60 (highest)—2810
Returns on capital—55372 (highest)
Balance-sheet safety28040 (highest)28
Capital allocation4484 (highest)—44
No price data1730% above value if growth stopped todayNo price dataNo price data
Market cap$4.7M$2.0B$5.7BNot reported
Moat tierShallow moatShallow moatShallow moatShallow moat
Filing dateFY2026FY2025FY2025FY2025