The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
PRKR · Technology · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
DXC · Technology · Shallow moat
On the watchlist
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | PRKR | FDCT | DXC | NTWK |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 59 (highest) | 59 (highest) | 59 (highest) | 59 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 85 (highest) | 85 (highest) | 15 | 69 |
| Pricing power | 70 (highest) | 53 | — | 70 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | — | 12 | 70 (highest) | 22 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 55 | 100 (highest) | 50 | 100 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 24 | 44 | 100 (highest) | 32 |
| No price data | 12783% above value if growth stopped today | 85% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 251% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $12.9M | $1.3B | $2.2B | $73.8M |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2026 |