The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

PRM · Materials · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

SDRL · Materials · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

EP · Materials · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

SNES · Materials · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

MeasurePRMSDRLEPSNES
Moat Score (0–100)36 (highest)36 (highest)36 (highest)36 (highest)
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend43244165 (highest)
Pricing power53 (highest)43
Returns on capital037 (highest)40
Balance-sheet safety284255 (highest)28
Capital allocation56 (highest)434444
443% above value if growth stopped today16% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today)No price dataNo price data
Market cap$5.0B$2.8B$88.9M$7.3M
Moat tierNo moatNo moatNo moatNo moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2025FY2025FY2025