The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
SDRL · Materials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
EP · Materials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | PRM | SDRL | EP | SNES |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 36 (highest) | 36 (highest) | 36 (highest) | 36 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 43 | 24 | 41 | 65 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 53 (highest) | — | — | 43 |
| Returns on capital | 0 | 37 (highest) | 4 | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 28 | 42 | 55 (highest) | 28 |
| Capital allocation | 56 (highest) | 43 | 44 | 44 |
| 339% above value if growth stopped today | 13% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | No price data | No price data | |
| Market cap | $4.1B | $2.9B | $114M | $3.7M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |