The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

PRPL · Materials · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

OC · Materials · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

NWL · Materials · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

BSIN · Materials · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MeasurePRPLOCNWLBSIN
Moat Score (0–100)34 (highest)34 (highest)34 (highest)34 (highest)
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend3044 (highest)1035
Pricing power61 (highest)3755
Returns on capital025 (highest)00
Balance-sheet safety2804055 (highest)
Capital allocation4964 (highest)64 (highest)44
No price data5% below value if growth stopped todayNo price dataNo price data
Market capNot reported$11.4B$2.1B$44M
Moat tierNo moatNo moatNo moatNo moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2025FY2025FY2025