The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
PZZA · Consumer Discretionary · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
SHAK · Consumer Discretionary · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | PZZA | SHAK | PSMT | ALV |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 65 | 66 (highest) | 65 | 65 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 75 | 75 | 100 (highest) | 94 |
| Pricing power | — | — | 18 | 29 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 96 (highest) | 7 | 53 | 70 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 48 | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) | 62 |
| Capital allocation | 40 | 80 (highest) | 56 | 68 |
| 9% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | No price data | 372% above value if growth stopped today | 62% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $996M | Not reported | $5.7B | $8.8B |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |