The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
TTEC · Technology · Shallow moat
On the watchlist
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | QXL | SSNC | SHLS | TTEC |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 45 (highest) | 45 (highest) | 45 (highest) | 45 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 50 | 69 | 70 (highest) | 27 |
| Pricing power | 70 | 77 (highest) | 55 | — |
| Returns on capital | 7 | 8 | 45 | 93 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 55 (highest) | 13 | 37 | 28 |
| Capital allocation | 44 | 60 (highest) | 19 | 33 |
| No price data | 16% above value if growth stopped today | 324% above value if growth stopped today | 78% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | |
| Market cap | $52.3M | $17.8B | $1.6B | $103M |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |