The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
R · Consumer Discretionary · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | R | FND | G | MUSA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 74 | 76 (highest) | 75 | 74 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 80 | 56 | 87 (highest) | 66 |
| Pricing power | 100 (highest) | 72 | 60 | 100 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | — | 72 | 73 | 100 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 26 | 100 (highest) | 64 | 36 |
| Capital discipline | 92 (highest) | 78 | 88 | 68 |
| Price vs. high estimate | 83% above high estimate | 92% above high estimate | 44% below high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) | No price data |
| Market cap | $10.6B | $5.8B | $5.3B | Not reported |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |