The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
RAVE · Industrials · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
KBH · Industrials · Narrow moat
Wonderful & reasonably priced
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | RAVE | KBH | LKQ | COR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 72 (highest) | 72 (highest) | 72 (highest) | 72 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 93 (highest) | 45 | 37 | 79 |
| Pricing power | 92 (highest) | — | 67 | 22 |
| Returns on capital | — | 66 | 74 | 100 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 78 | 78 | 100 (highest) | 88 |
| Capital allocation | 24 | 100 (highest) | 80 | 70 |
| 48% above value if growth stopped today | 50% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 37% below value if growth stopped today | 198% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $43.1M | $3.3B | $6.6B | $64.2B |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |