The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

RIVN · Consumer Discretionary · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

FFAI · Consumer Discretionary · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The businessTrend component abstained: Fewer than two aligned fiscal years of revenue and diluted EPS are available; the filing history does not contain a measurable trend. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

HLEO · Consumer Discretionary · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

AIHS · Consumer Discretionary · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

MeasureRIVNFFAIHLEOAIHS
Moat Score (0–100)24 (highest)24 (highest)24 (highest)24 (highest)
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend70 (highest)015
Pricing power0026 (highest)7
Returns on capital0 (highest)0 (highest)0 (highest)
Balance-sheet safety2855 (highest)2855 (highest)
Capital allocation244244 (highest)44 (highest)
No price dataNo price dataNo price dataNo price data
Market cap$19.6BNot reported$46.5M$6.1M
Moat tierNo moatNo moatNo moatNo moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2025FY2025FY2026