The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
RJET · Industrials · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | RJET | IVFH | RELL | RUN |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 49 (highest) | 49 (highest) | 49 (highest) | 49 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 95 (highest) | 44 | 36 | 70 |
| Pricing power | — | 39 | 56 | 86 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 7 | 37 (highest) | 7 | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 13 | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) | 28 |
| Capital allocation | 80 (highest) | 24 | 44 | 60 |
| 2% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | No price data | No price data | |
| Market cap | $733M | $8.2M | Not reported | $1.7B |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 |