The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

RKLB · Consumer Discretionary · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

THO · Consumer Discretionary · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

ISPC · Consumer Discretionary · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

RDW · Consumer Discretionary · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

MeasureRKLBTHOISPCRDW
Moat Score (0–100)29 (highest)29 (highest)29 (highest)29 (highest)
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend65 (highest)151560
Pricing power02358 (highest)4
Returns on capital0 (highest)—0 (highest)0 (highest)
Balance-sheet safety55 (highest)55 (highest)2855 (highest)
Capital allocation242444 (highest)24
No price data22% below value if growth stopped todayNo price dataNo price data
Market cap$27.6B$3.5B$7.8M$1.6B
Moat tierNo moatNo moatNo moatNo moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2026FY2025FY2025