The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
USDW · Technology · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
AMPL · Technology · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | RMBS | USDW | AMPL | SCDA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 73 (highest) | 73 (highest) | 73 (highest) | 72 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 90 | 70 | 70 | 100 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 94 | 100 (highest) | 99 | 95 |
| Returns on capital | 20 | — | — | 88 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 73 | 78 (highest) | 78 (highest) | 55 |
| Capital allocation | 86 (highest) | 44 | 44 | 24 |
| 418% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | No price data | 403% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | |
| Market cap | $10.3B | Not reported | $1.1B | $9.5M |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2015 |