The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
RMTG · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
STRT · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
AIRO · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
CBRL · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
| Measure | RMTG | STRT | AIRO | CBRL |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 50 | 51 (highest) | 51 (highest) | 50 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 60 | 88 (highest) | 59 | 36 |
| Pricing power | 62 | 10 | 94 | 100 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | — | 22 | 0 | 62 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 55 | 73 (highest) | 55 | 18 |
| Capital allocation | 24 | 60 (highest) | 44 | 34 |
| No price data | 6% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | No price data | 199% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $524245 | $241M | $166M | $1.5B |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2026 |