The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
CHTR · Communications · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | ROKU | NXPL | MGAM | CHTR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 36 (highest) | 36 (highest) | 36 (highest) | 36 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 60 (highest) | 57 | 30 | 55 |
| Pricing power | 64 | 26 | 100 (highest) | — |
| Returns on capital | 4 | 0 | 0 | 11 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 28 | 55 (highest) | 28 | 40 |
| Capital discipline | 24 | 44 (highest) | 24 | 37 |
| Price vs. high estimate | No price data | No price data | No price data | No price data |
| Market cap | $21.0B | $157M | $27937 | Not reported |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |