The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
INSW · Industrials · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | ROP | INSW | CAH | AGCO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 54 (highest) | 54 (highest) | 54 (highest) | 54 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 89 (highest) | 65 | 83 | 31 |
| Pricing power | 97 (highest) | — | 14 | 36 |
| Returns on capital | 5 | 14 | 54 (highest) | 29 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 28 | 58 | 53 | 76 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 51 | 80 | 66 | 97 (highest) |
| 139% above value if growth stopped today | 30% above value if growth stopped today | 405% above value if growth stopped today | 22% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | |
| Market cap | $40.8B | $5.6B | $59.0B | $7.7B |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 |