The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
INSW · Industrials · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | ROP | RS | INSW | AGCO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 54 (highest) | 54 (highest) | 54 (highest) | 54 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 89 (highest) | 26 | 65 | 31 |
| Pricing power | 97 (highest) | 51 | — | 36 |
| Returns on capital | 5 | 42 (highest) | 14 | 29 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 28 | 68 | 58 | 76 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 51 | 85 | 80 | 97 (highest) |
| 129% above value if growth stopped today | 42% above value if growth stopped today | 6% above value if growth stopped today | 11% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | |
| Market cap | $39.2B | $21.1B | $4.6B | $8.8B |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |