The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
RUSHA · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
WAB · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
TSSI · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | RUSHA | PKE | WAB | TSSI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 55 (highest) | 55 (highest) | 55 (highest) | 55 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 68 | 83 | 99 (highest) | 85 |
| Pricing power | 31 | 49 (highest) | 49 (highest) | 10 |
| Returns on capital | 47 (highest) | 9 | 6 | — |
| Balance-sheet safety | 69 | 100 (highest) | 41 | 100 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 60 | 35 | 80 (highest) | 24 |
| 83% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 660% above value if growth stopped today | 300% above value if growth stopped today | 17483% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $6.2B | $715M | $51.6B | $268M |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2025 |