The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
RXO · Industrials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
SHIM · Industrials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | RXO | SHIM | TWI | WOR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 18 (highest) | 18 (highest) | 18 (highest) | 18 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 40 (highest) | 20 | 31 | 5 |
| Pricing power | — | 0 | 9 (highest) | 1 |
| Returns on capital | 6 | — | 14 (highest) | 4 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 0 | 28 | 0 | 35 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 24 | 24 | 33 | 42 (highest) |
| 5310% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | 21% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 12% below value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $4.2B | $132M | $513M | $2.8B |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |