The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
SBH · Consumer Discretionary · Narrow moat
Wonderful & reasonably priced
| Measure | SBH | WLDN | TTEK | YUM |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 64 (highest) | 64 (highest) | 64 (highest) | 64 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 43 | 85 (highest) | 79 | 65 |
| Pricing power | 85 | 52 | 20 | 90 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 100 (highest) | 24 | 73 | 100 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 40 | 100 (highest) | 57 | 7 |
| Capital allocation | 53 | 60 | 91 (highest) | 56 |
| 34% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 454% above value if growth stopped today | 159% above value if growth stopped today | 138% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $1.4B | $1.1B | $8.3B | $41.2B |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |