The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
BDL · Consumer Discretionary · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | SBUX | YUM | TILE | BDL |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 62 | 64 (highest) | 63 | 62 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 48 | 65 | 82 (highest) | 55 |
| Pricing power | 97 (highest) | 90 | 62 | — |
| Returns on capital | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) | 39 | 64 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 26 | 7 | 64 | 72 (highest) |
| Capital discipline | 42 | 56 | 69 (highest) | 58 |
| Price vs. high estimate | 73% above high estimate | 47% above high estimate | 134% above high estimate | 31% above high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) |
| Market cap | $117.4B | $41.2B | $1.9B | $73.3M |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |